Good Org Design Is Good Agent Orchestration
What building AI agents taught me about organizational design and what organizational design taught me about building good AI agents.
Good organization design is good AI agent orchestration design.
I’ve been sitting with this idea for a while now, and I think it’s more true than it first appears.
I’ve spent years thinking about organizations that actually work the way the books say they should.
Clear communication. Aligned goals. Values that guide decisions without constant oversight. The kind of org where you encode intent into the system so you don’t need constant intervention.
In the past year, as I’ve been exploring AI agents and expanding how I work with them, I’ve noticed that good organizational design exactly what you do when you write agent instructions.
Human orgs accumulate dysfunction over time - politics, misaligned incentives, unclear expectations. We work around it. We read between the lines. We manage up and down and sideways.
AI doesn’t do any of that. It needs the org we always should have built.
The messy parts of human organizations - the jealousy, the motivation problems, the politics - those aren’t features of good design. They’re bugs in the human implementation.
Strip away the parts of an organization that most people hate, and what’s left is the pure structure. If it’s designed right, that transfers directly to agent orchestration.
The best parts of culture get baked into how you codify your agent instructions. No politics. No motivation problems. Just intent, values, and execution encoded directly into the system.
This is a forcing function. AI won’t tolerate the ambiguity we’ve learned to muddle through. It’s making us finally build organizations the way we always knew we should.
Here’s my bet for 2026: the companies that pull ahead will be the ones that encourage every team member to build their own organization of agents.
A team of many becomes many teams of one.


